Class Action

McCrea v. General Attorney of Canada

EI Sickness Benefits for Mothers on Maternity

Date of Filing January 20, 2012
Status Pending Certification
Jurisdiction Ontario
Categories Government and Municipal, Other
All Parties
Jennifer McCrea and Carissa Kasbohm v. Attorney General of Canada

Overview

Jennifer McCrea and Carissa Kasbohm launched a proposed class action against the federal government alleging that 30 000 to 40 000 women who suffered a serious illness or injury while they were on parental leave after the birth of a child have been unfairly denied Employment Insurance Sickness Benefits (EISB).

This significant proposed class action follows the July 2011 success of Ms Natalya Rougas, a Toronto mother, who won benefits from the federal employment insurance program. Both Rougas and McCrea were diagnosed with breast cancer toward the end of their maternity leave and had double mastectomies, which required several more weeks of recovery. EI officials rejected their claims for additional coverage using the argument that, because of their maternity leave status, they could not demonstrate that they would have been working if otherwise healthy. Rougas won her individual lawsuit on appeal. McCrea was denied EISB benefits despite Rougas’ victory on the same matter.

 
 

by: MyClassAction

For More Information

Mr Stephen Moreau
Cavalluzzo Hayes Shilton McIntyre & Cornish LLP
416-964-5541

 
 

Class Counsels Defendants' Counsels


Cavalluzzo Hayes Shilton McIntyre & Cornish LLP
 
 

Similar Class Actions

SMITH v. KRONES MACHINERY CO. LTD.

Krones Machinery - Brampton Facility Closure

 

LECLAIR v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO

Ontario Nurses' Association CCAC Pension

 

IRELAND and al. v. VISKASE COMPANIES INC. and al.

Viskase Inc. - Post Retirement Benefits

 

MICHAEL PENTON v. PARKER CANADA HOLDING CO.

Park Hannifin Canada

 

KEVIN NORRIS and al v. JOHN CONTROLS L.P., and AL

Johnson Controls